Google
 

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Winner na ba ang LGBT sa UP? (A Public Forum)



"Winner na ba ang LGBT sa UP?" is the fourth forum of the 2012 TWSC Public Forum Series, "Ang Tama ba sa UP, Tama rin sa Bayan?"

Please click here for the playlist of the forum's video recordings.

SCHEDULE
28 November 2012 (Wednesday), 9:00 AM - 12:00 NN

VENUE
Pulungang Claro M. Recto (Faculty Center Conference Hall), Rizal Hall, College of Arts and Letters, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City

PROGRAM

8:30 – 9:00
REGISTRATION

9:00 - 9:10
WELCOME REMARKS
Michael L. Tan, PhD
Dean
College of Social Sciences and Philosophy
University of the Philippines-Diliman

9:10 - 9:20
INTRODUCTION OF SPEAKERS

9:20 - 9:40
Heart F. Diño
Chairperson
University Student Council
University of the Philippines-Diliman

9:40 – 10:00
Prescilla D. Tulipat
Guidance Counselor
Diliman Gender OfficeUniversity of the Philippines-Diliman

10:00 – 10:20
Eric J. Manalastas
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychology
College of Social Sciences and Philosophy
University of the Philippines-Diliman

10:20 - 11:50
OPEN FORUM

11:50 - 12:00
SYNTHESIS                                                                                                                         

MODERATOR
Soledad M. Dalisay, PhD
Associate Professor
Department of Anthropology
College of Social Sciences and Philosophy
University of the Philippines-Diliman

ABOUT THE FORUM
In March 2012, the Philippine Daily Inquirer editorial wrote that, UP, “true to its vaunted cutting edge . . . has produced another first,” with the triumph of Heart Diño as the first transgender University Student Council (USC) Chairperson. Bisexual and transgender students were also elected as USC Vice Chair and Councilor respectively. But this unprecedented victory has blotted out events that left a bad taste in the mouths of those exalting UP as “a sanctuary of openness, acceptance and liberalism for members of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT) community.” Other candidates to the USC chairperson post, belonging to progressive organizations and taking pride in their feminist and “inclusive-activism” advocacies, have allegedly made heteronormative and transphobic remarks against Diño during her candidacy. Moreover, said milestone for the LGBT struggle transpired shortly after UP Babaylan, the first and largest LGBT student organization in the Philippines, had claimed that discrimination is still prevalent in the UP Diliman campus. Graduation rites, org applications, rest rooms, office space, and classrooms remain sites of bullying, ridiculing, and stigmatization. This is despite the promotion of gender equality within the university through university gender sensitivity initiatives, university gay games, university educational discussions on LGBT issues, and tie-ups with other LGBT organizations. The UP Charter of 2008, as stated in the UP website, mandates UP to go beyond traditional solutions and pursue innovative approaches on issues confronting the University. Despite UP’s avowedly progressive view of LGBTs, can UP be considered as privy to gender discrimination or is UP’s cognizance of LGBT issues “marked by a mild or negligent tolerance” as suggested in the UP Forum? This forum thus looks at the present stance of UP towards the LGBT community from the perspectives of the various sectors within the UP System.

KEY QUESTIONS:

1.    What are the different issues confronted by the LGBT community in the university?

2.    What is the stance of UP towards the LGBT community against the backdrop of LBGT issues in the country?

3.    Despite its avowedly progressive view of LGBTs, can UP be considered as privy to gender discrimination? How can it be demonstrated otherwise? Or is UP’s cognizance of LGBT issues “marked by a mild or negligent tolerance”?

4.    Does UP adequately address gender discrimination issues within the university? What are the policy frameworks and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure that the university promotes and protects LGBT rights? Does UP have the statistics to back up its claim to the existing LGBT climate in UP?


Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Pangmayaman na lang ba ang UP? (A Public Forum)



"Pangmayaman Na Lang Ba Ang UP?" is the third forum of the 2012 TWSC Public Forum Series, "Ang Tama ba sa UP, Tama rin sa Bayan?"

Please click here for the playlist of the forum's video recordings.

SCHEDULE
14 November 2012 (Wednesday), 9:00 AM - 12:00 NN


VENUE
Pulungang Claro M. Recto (Faculty Center Conference Hall), Rizal Hall, College of Arts and Letters, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City


PROGRAM
8:30 – 9:00
REGISTRATION

9:00 - 9:05
WELCOME REMARKS
Maria Corazon J. Tan
Vice-Chancellor for Student Affairs
University of the Philippines-Diliman

9:05 - 9:15
INTRODUCTION OF SPEAKERS

9:15 - 9:35
Gerald Pio M. Franco
Director
Office of Admissions
University of the Philippines

9:35 - 9:55
Richard Philip A. Gonzalo
Former Officer in Charge
Office of Scholarships and Student Services
University of the Philippines-Diliman

9:55 – 10:15
John Erwin S. Bañez
Assistant Professor
Department of Community Development
College of Social Work and Community Development
University of the Philippines-Diliman

10:15 – 10:35
Cleve Kevin Robert V. Arguelles
Student Regent
University of the Philippines

10:35 - 11:50
OPEN FORUM

11:50 - 12:00
SYNTHESIS                                       


MODERATOR
Jean Encinas-Franco, PhD
Assistant Professor
Department of Political Science
College of Social Sciences and Philosophy
University of the Philippines-Diliman


ABOUT THE FORUM
“Edukasyon! Edukasyon! Karapatan ng Mamamayan!” If only the zeal in shouting such tired slogans are made into money, then all the poor but deserving students would indeed end up in UP. But it seems the reality in UP these days is this: only those who can pay their way are allowed to bring home a college degree. The so-called poor and deserving students fend for themselves—if only to prove that indeed they will survive out of sheer intelligence. Even the UP Collegian, in its 20 June 2012 issue, quoted UP President Alfredo Pascual as saying, “mayayaman na lang talaga ang nag-aaral sa UP.” Section 9 of the UP Charter of 2008 says UP “shall take affirmative steps which may take the form of an alternative and equitable admissions process to enhance the access of disadvantaged students, such as indigenous peoples, poor and deserving students including but not limited to valedictorians and salutatorians of public high schools, and students from depressed areas, to its programs and services.” However by some prestidigitation, the present dispensation’s UP Strategic Plan for 2011-2017 now claims “to recruit the best and the brightest students from all over the country regardless of economic status.” What's more, it aims to review and rationalize UPCAT “to make it more aptitude-based rather than achievement-based.” This ambivalence results in the further marginalization of the disadvantaged students who were granted privileged status in the UP Charter of 2008. In teasing out the above contrarieties, how can we define the goal of “democratic access” in the National University? How far is UP in addressing in full said objective? This forum will be a survey of how committed UP is to this singular mandate.

Monday, October 01, 2012

New TWSC Deputy Director

We are pleased to announce that effective today, 01 October 2012, Perlita M. Frago-Marasigan, PhD, an assistant professor at the Department of Political Science, College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of the Philippines-Diliman is TWSC's new deputy director.  

Sunday, September 16, 2012

A Public Lecture on South Africa's Foreign Policy by South African Deputy Minister Hon. Ebrahim Ismail Ebrahim

South Africa’s Foreign Policy: A Vision For South–South Cooperation

A Public Lecture by Hon. Ebrahim Ismail Ebrahim
(Deputy Minister, Department of International Relations and Cooperation, Republic of South Africa)

25 September 2012 (Tuesday)
10:00–11:30 AM

Department of Political Science Audiovisual Room
3rd Floor, College of Social Sciences and Philosophy Faculty Center
(at the back of Palma Hall Annex)
University of the Philippines-Diliman
Quezon City

Please click here for the playlist of the lecture's video recordings.


PROGRAM

10:00 – 10:05

Welcome Remarks
Maria Ela L. Atienza, PhD
Director
Third World Studies Center and
Associate Professor
Department of Political Science
College of Social Sciences and Philosophy
University of the Philippines-Diliman


10:05 – 10:10
Introduction of the Speaker
Hon. Agnes Nyamande-Pitso
Ambassador
Embassy of the Republic of South Africa in the Philippines

10:10 – 10:40
Hon. Ebrahim Ismael Ebrahim
Deputy Minister
Department of International Relations and Cooperation
Republic of South Africa

10:40 – 11:25
Open Forum

11:25 – 11:30
Closing Remarks
Ruth Lusterio-Rico, PhD
Chair and
Associate Professor
Department of Political Science
College of Social Sciences and Philosophy
University of the Philippines-Diliman


Moderator
Ronald Molmisa
Assistant Professor
Department of Political Science
College of Social Sciences and Philosophy
University of the Philippines-Diliman

Organized by the Embassy of South Africa in the Philippines and the UP Third World Studies Center in cooperation with the UP Diliman Department of Political Science.

Please click here for a copy of the Deputy Minister's speech.

Friday, September 14, 2012

Gwardya, Kamera, Aksyon?: Surveillance and Security in the University (A Public Forum)





"Gwardya, Kamera, Aksyon?: Surveillance and Security in the University" is the second forum of the 2012 TWSC Public Forum Series, "Ang Tama ba sa UP, Tama rin sa Bayan?"

September 26, 2012 (Wednesday), 9:00 AM - 12:00 NN

Pulungang Claro M. Recto (Faculty Center Conference Hall), Rizal Hall, College of Arts and Letter, University of the Philippines-Diliman

Please click here for the playlist of video recordings of the forum. 


PROGRAM

9:00 - 9:15
REGISTRATION

9:15 - 9:20
WELCOME REMARKS
Neil Martial Santillan, PhD
Associate Dean for Administration and External Affairs
College of Social Sciences and Philosophy
University of the Philippines-Diliman

9:20 - 9:30
INTRODUCTION OF SPEAKERS
Filomin C. Gutierrez, PhD
Associate Professor
Department of Sociology
College of Social Sciences and Philosophy
University of the Philippines-Diliman

9:30 - 9:50
Melania Abad-Flores
Vice Chancellor for Community Affairs
University of the Philippines-Diliman

9:50 - 10:10
Edgardo E. Dagdag 
Chief Security Officer
University of the Philippines-Diliman

10:10 - 10:30
Agerico M. De Villa
Associate Professor
Department of Philosophy
College of Social Sciences and Philosophy
University of the Philippines-Diliman

10:30 - 11:50
OPEN FORUM

11:50 - 12:00
SYNTHESIS
Filomin C. Gutierrez, PhD
Associate Professor
Department of Sociology
College of Social Sciences and Philosophy
University of the Philippines-Diliman


ABOUT THE FORUM

The recent string of violence in several UP campuses paved the way for the entry of new forms of anti-crime measures. With the launch of a technology transformation initiative dubbed eUP last March 2012, UP President Alfredo Pascual stated, among other things, that UP is already preparing the deployment of various technology solutions to address security issues in the different campuses. Such preparations involve the installation of closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras in strategic areas within the constituent units, aside from increasing the number of security guards and watchmen. Some have welcomed the impending installation of CCTV, calling it long overdue in the midst of what the media had portrayed as a near-system-wide crime wave in the last months. Others have deplored it, crying violation of student rights and academic freedom. Some even believe that CCTV cameras will serve as spy cameras to be used by external entities on the assumption that UP serves as a breeding ground for rebels and activists. Moreover, the cynical warn of the private sector's encroachment of the university's public space and the potential emergence of a security industry. This forum thus provides a platform for the debates on CCTV as anti-crime measure, particularly in UP campuses, which have been slow in coming. It seeks to examine UP's delicate balancing act--on how at a click of a camera, UP catches perpetrators in the act and in a zoom, rob its constituencies of their deserved anonymity while in a public space. Will UP think before it clicks and zooms in?

See photos of the forum here: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.462156343807265.103267.125780737444829&type=1